Kya karbala ki jung, haq wa batil ki thi ya siyaasi (polotical) ?

Maahe muharram ki in gair sharai bidat wa rasmon ke elawa karbala ke waqeye ke baare me bhi aksar ahle sunnat ka sochne ka tareeqa sahih nahi, is silsile me kuch baatein kahne ki koshish karunga, ummeed hai ahle sunnat halqe is par poori sanjeedagi aur ilm wa soojh boojh ki roshni me gaur karenge

kya karbala ki jung, haq wa batil ki thi ya siyaasi??

is silsile me pahli baat yah hai ki ahle sunnat ke khutba aur jalse shahadat ke falsafa hz hussain ra ko aam taur par aise be saboot waqeye bayan karte hain jo peshewar shiat andaaze fikr aur raafzi(shia) ka bayan hota hai,

aur is baare me yah bataya jaata hai ki yah tareekh e islam me haq wa batil ki sabse badi jung thi, ye peshewar(professional) ulama ye nahi sochte ki agar aisa hi hota to us bhale zamaane me jab ki sahaba e kiram ki bhi badi jamaat maujood thi aur unke faiz paaye tabieen badi tadaat me they, is jung me Hz hussain (ra) hi akele kyon mukaabil hote??

Jab jung haq wa batil aur kufr wa islam ki aur sahaba wa tabieen isse na sirf yah ki alag rahte balki hz hussain(ra) ko bhi rokte, kya aisa mumkin tha??

Shi'at ideology to yahi hai ki wah (maaz'allah) sahaba kiram ra ke kufr wa islam me ek taraf hz hussain ra they aur dusri taraf sahaba samet yazid aur tabieen aur tamam himaayti,

sahaba wa tabien is jung me khamosh tamaashaai bane rahe aur hz hussain ra ne islam ko bachaane ke liye jaan ki baazi laga di lekin kya AHLE SUNNAT is baat ko tasleem karenge??

Kya sahaba wa tabieen ki is be-gairti(naozubillah) ki we(ahle sunnat) pairwi karenge jo shi'at andaaz e fikr ka nateeza hai??

Kya sahaba naozubillah be-gairat they?? 

Kya unme deen ko bachaane ki himmat nahi thi??

Beshak ki koi AHLE SUNNAT sahaba kiram ra ke baare me is tarah ka aqeeda nahi rakhta,

lekin isi ke saath saath haqiqat bhi badi kadwi Hai ki AHLE SUNNAT shahadat hussain ka jo falsafa bayan karte hain wah isi taal sur se tarteeb paata hai jo shi'at ka raag hai !

Baat yah hai ki karbala ko haq wa baatil ki jung saabit karaane se sahaba kiram ka rutba, charactor aur unki deeni gairat ghaayal hoti hai aur shia'aon ka maqsad bhi yahi hai lekin yah hamare sochne ki baat hai ki haqiqat me aisa hai ya nahi??

To haqiqat yah hai ki yah haq wa batil ka takraao nahi tha, yah kufr wa islam ka maamla nahi tha, yah islami jihaad nahi tha, agar aisa hota to us raah me hz hussain ra akele shaheed na hote, un sahaba kiram ka saath bhi haasil hota jin ke poori umaren(age) allah ke qalmah ko buland karne me guzrin jo har waqt baatil ke liye nangi talwar aur kufr wa jahiliyat ke liye khudaai lalkaar they,

yah takraav asal me ek siyaasi(political) tha,

isko samjhne ke liye ye samjhna zaroori hai:-

1- karbala ke waqeye se mutaallik tareekh(history)
Me hai ki hz hussain ra jab koofa ki taraf ravaana hone ke liye taiyyar ho gaye to unke rishtedaaron auq hamdardon ne unhe rokne ki poori koshish ki aur ki kadam ke khatarnaak nateejon se unko hoshiyaar kiya, unme hz abdullah bin umar ra, hz abu saeed khudri ra, hz abu darda ra, hz abu waqid laisi ra, jaabir bin abdullah ra, hz abdullah bin abbas ra, aur hz hussain ra ke bhai hz muhammad bin hanfiya ra bhi they,

aap ne unke jawab me na safar ka iraada mutlawi farmaya na apne raaye ki koi daleel pesh ki, warna mumkin tha ki we bhi is me unke saath ho jaate,

asal me hz hussain ra ke zahen me yah baat thi ki koofa waale unko lagaatar koofa aane ki dawat de rahen hain, beshak wahan jaana faayedemand(useful) hoga

2- tareekh me yah bhi aata hai ki abhi aap raaste me hi they ki aapko khabar pahunchi ki koofe me aapke chachere bhai hz muslim bin akeel rh shaheed kar diye gaye jin ko aapne koofe ke haalat
Malum karne ke liye bheja tha, is khabar se aap ka koofa walon se bharosa dagmaga gaya aur waapsi ka iraada zaahir kiya, lekin hz muslim rh ke bhaiyyon ne yah kah kar wapas hone se inkaar kar diya ki ham to apne bhai muslim ka badla lenge ya khud bhi mar jaayenge us par hz hussain ra ne farmaya:-" tumhare bina main bhi jee kar kya karunga??"

" hz hussain ra ne waapsi ka iraada kar liya, lekin aapke saath muslim bin akeel ke jo bhai they, unhone kaha ki ham to us waqt tak wapas nahi jaayenge jab tak ki badla na le len ya phir khud ki qatl na ho jaayen??"

(tareekh tabri 4/292)

aur yun kaafile ka safar koofe ki taraf jaari raha

3- phir is par bhi tamam tareekh likhne waale(historian) sahmat hain ki hz hussain ra jab maqaam e karbala par pahunche to koofa ke governor ibne ziyaad ne amr bin saad ko majboor karke aap ke muqaable ke liye bheja, amr bin saad ne aapki khidmat me haazir hokar aapse baat ki To tareekh likhne walon ki riwayaton ke mutabik hz hussain ra ne unke saamne yah masauda rakha

" 3 baaton mese ek baat maan lo, 

1- main ya to kisi islami sarhad(boundary) par chala jaata hun.

2- ya madina wapas chala jaata hun

3- ya phir main(seedhe jaakar) yazid bin muawiya ke haath me apna haath de deta hun(yani unse bait kar leta hun) amr bin saad ne unka yah masauda qubool kar liya "

(al asaba 2/17)

ibne saad ne khud manzoor kar lene ke baad yah masauda ibne ziyaad governor koofa ko likh kar bheja lekin usne is masaude ko maanne se inkaar kar diya aur is baat par zidd ki ke pahle wah (yazid ke liye) mere haath par bait kare

(al asaba 2/17, tabri 4/392)

hz hussain ra iske liye taiyyar na huwe aur unke dil ne yah gawaara na kiya, isliye is shart ko kubool nahi kiya jispar ladaai chhid gayh aur aap ki mazlumaana shahadat ki waqeya pesh aaya,

is riwayat ke alfaaz jis me hz hussain ra ne Bait yazid par razamandi zaahir ki " al asaba" ke elawa " tahzeebut tahzeeb 2/328-353", tareekh tabri 4/293, tahzeeb tareekh ibne asaakir 4/325-337, al badaya wan nihaaya 8/170-175, kaamil ibne aseer 3/283 me maujood hain, yahan tak ki shia kitabon me bhi hai

in haalaat se malum huwa ki agar yah haq wa baatil ki jung hoti to koofe ke qareeb pahunchkar jab aapko muslim bin akeel ki mazlumaana shahadat ki khabar mili thi, aap waapsi ka iraada na farmate, saaf si baat hai ki haq ki raah me kisi ki shahadat se haq ko qayam aur baatil ko mitaane ka fareeza khatm nahi ho jaata

phir in samjhaute ki sharton se jo hz hussain ra ne amr bin saad ke saamne rakhi thi, yah baat bilkul saaf ho jaati hai ki aap ke zehan me kuch bachaao(defence) ki ummeed thi bhi to aap unse alag ho gaye they, balki yazid ki hukumat tak ko tasleem kar lene ko taiyyar ho gaye they

ek yah baat isse saaf hui ki sayyedna hussain ra, Ameer yazid ko gunahgaar, zinakaar, sharaabi ya hukumat ke naakaabil nahi samjhte they, agar aisa hota to we kisi haalat me bhi apna haath uske haath me dene ke liye taiyyar na hote jaisa ki wah taiyyar ho gaye they, balki yazid ke paas jaane ke mutaalbe se yah bhh malum hota hai ki aapko unse acche bartaao(akhlaaki) ki hi ummeed thi,

zaalim baadshah ke paas jaane ki ummeed(aakhiri raaste ke taur par bhi) koi nahi karta

is khulaase se is waqeye ke zimmedaar bhi nange ho jaate hain aur wah hai ibne ziyad ki fauj, jisme sab wahi koofi they jinhone aapko khat(letter) likh kar bulaaya tha, unhi koofiyon ne amr bin saad ki samjhaute (treaty) ki koshishon ko nakaam bana diya jisse karbala ka ye waqeya pesh aaya.